This document (a photocopy of the case is at the end of the publication) shows how the SBU (Security Service of Ukraine) initiated a criminal case against Dymytry Sydor, accusing him of a crime he did not commit.
He used the Soviet "methodology" of instigating a court case, and then "creating evidence", including and conclusions of examinations. The evidence would be revealed not in his personal matter, but between the terms of the summons document that was read at the Congress. The document itself was developed jointly by a commission from among the NRRZ (People's Council of Rusyns of Transcarpathia) and the Soym of SR(Subcarpathian Rus), and was corrected and adopted by a general vote by the 2nd European Congress of Subcarpathian Rusyns on October 25, 2008. At the same time, personal summonses of the SBU to Dymytriy Sydor were not found. But the appeals were found by SBU experts in the text "hidden between the lines" in the decision of the Rusyn Congress.
But it was impossible to judge all the signed 105 delegates and the same number of guests. The SBU decided to place the blame only on Dymytriy Sydor, co-chairman of the 2nd ECSR (European Congress of Subcarpathian Rusyns), and organized a politically motivated public prosecution of him in order to intimidate all Rusyns. We read the document in 10 points:
In clauses 1.2.3. we read: on December 5, 2008, the SBU, under the pressure of its head Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, hastily opened a criminal case against Dymytriy Sydor.
4 point. Already on February 2, 2009, i.e. two months later, the regional prosecutor's office discovered the absence of a crime in Dymytriy Sydor's actions, even though the case was accepted by judge Ivan Stan "for trial". At the same time, the prosecutor's office transferred the case for investigation for the 4th month - until June 2, 2009. On July 22, 2009, the investigation was extended for another 5 months.
On August 26, 2009, a month later, the investigation was extended for 6 months.
And only on September 16, 2009, the SBU changed the text of the indictment and issued a "new indictment" under the guise of being "supplemented" to the one presented earlier - on October 25, 2008.
In clauses 5.6. From February 24, 2009 to June 30, 2009, the "case" was pending in the Uzhhorod District Court, when the "pre-trial investigation was suspended" due to the fact of falsification of the case against Dymytriy Sydor.
It is this court that could stop the illegal actions of the SBU. But the judge, a woman, did not dare to cancel the clearly criminal charge against Dymytriy Sydor from the SBU. And she knew about the decision of the prosecutor's office to investigate the case, in which D. Sydor's "components of the crime" were absent at that time. Moreover, the final indictment of Dymytriy Sydor for the SBU will be formed only after 7 months - on September 16, 2009.
In clauses 7.8.9. we see how the negative decision of the Uzhhorod district court allowed the illegal actions of the SBU to continue for another 4 years - until 2012.
10 point. In accordance with the requirements of Articles 208-220 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, the initiators of these politically motivated judicial repressions against the public figure Dymytriy Sydor were prescribed within two weeks - from September 16 to September 30 - to remove, i.e. will destroy all the previous evidence of the criminal investigators of the SBU and, in fact, the evidence against the judge Ivan Stan.
We assume that the judge was forced to commit this obvious crime - he will condemn a public figure who, at his request, restores the rights of the Ruthenian people in Transcarpathia.
All the crimes of the SBU and the Ukrainian court were recorded, documented, the originals copied, and the official complaint was transferred to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2012.
During the 8-year procedure, i.e. until 2020, the ECHR did not find a violation of the judicial procedure in the refusal to accept the complaint of the first instance to the second instance of the court - Zakarpattia Court of Appeal. They did not find any violations of the rights and freedoms of the Rusyn people in Ukraine, in Transcarpathia (in the center of Europe), even though the fact of protecting the rights and freedoms of the national minority in Ukraine by Dymytriy Sydor was the subject of the trial.
Almost an hour later, the SBU, not having found a single fact to initiate a criminal case, successfully opened a new case, but under the old number, in which there are no calls "to illegal change of borders" according to the previously incriminated article, coming from his own mouth Dymytriy Sydor, but such "calls between the lines of the text" are found by experts.
The authorities of Ukraine, who have been trampling on the rights and freedoms of the Rusyn people in Ukraine for 30 years, have not yet been condemned for their illegal actions, which have no statute of limitations.
Publication source: https://telegra.ph/%D0%86ndictment-in-case-number-499-02-09